Morning Glory: What does 'Hellscape' mean?

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

"Hellscape" is a dramatic word.  
 
It is the description of what awaits the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) of the People’s Republic of China if it is ordered to invade Taiwan by Xi Jinping, the general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party.  
 
We know this because Admiral Samuel Paparo, USN, is the big boss of the Pentagon’s "Pacific Command," and Paparo told us this through The Washington Post’s Josh Rogin: "Hellscape" is the description of the mission for the American military and its allies if China attempts to invade Taiwan.  

LANDMARK BILL TARGETS HIDDEN FOREIGN FUNDS IN SCHOOLS AS OFFICIALS WARN OF CCP INFLUENCE

Among Pacific Command’s many missions is to deter China from doing just that. Given the CCP’s massive investment in ship and submarine building and its repeated rehearsal of that invasion and its past cyber-attacks on our military, Paparo and everyone under his command has their work cut out for them: How to create a "Hellscape?"  

"I want to turn the Taiwan Strait into an unmanned hellscape using a number of classified capabilities," Paparo told Rogin. "So that I can make [PLAN’s] lives utterly miserable for a month, which buys me the time for the rest of everything." 
 
"Classified capabilities" means we can’t know the details or even the outline of the details. But Paparo did add "I can’t tell you what’s in" the plan to stop the Chinese military.  
 
"But," he added, "it’s real and it’s deliverable." 
 
On Wednesday’s program I suggested to Florida Republican Congressman Michael Waltz, who sits on the House Armed Services, Intelligence and Foreign Affairs Committee, that he and his colleagues invite Alex Karp of Palantir, Palmer Luckey of Anduril, Brett Granberg of Vannevar and Joe Lonsdale of Epirus, etc., to testify to one of his committees on how to rapidly move to the acquisition and deployment of the sort of "hellscape" weaponry that can empower our military to deter China from deciding about a move on Taiwan like Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasions of Ukraine under both President Barack Obama and again under President Joe Biden.  

Video

Deterrence failed in both those cases. Why would we think China is deterred when Putin wasn’t and China has a military significantly more powerful than Russia’s? 
 
Perhaps because the 90 miles or more of rough water separating China from Taiwan is just too difficult a leap to make? Perhaps because Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing is going to get blown up the moment the PLA starts crossing the red line? ("TSMC" is a Taiwan-based company that leads the world in the production of the semiconductors we need for our daily lives.)  

Perhaps because Xi suspects there are people on his Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party looking for a "Khrushchev moment." (Nikita Khrushchev was toppled as head of the Soviet Communist Party in 1964 by his "colleagues" on the USSR’s Politburo. It happens in totalitarian states.) If Xi decides to fly too close to the sun, will his colleagues act against him before he risks WWIII? 

We don’t know, but using a hearing with CEOs of our some of our most advanced tech companies is one way to educate Congress and by extension the public of what we need when it comes to weapons systems and when we need them without giving away the details of what we already have.  

FOR MORE OPINION

Suggestion: Pick up Jack Carr’s new thriller "Red Sky Mourning" to get a glimpse of what the future of warfare is. As Admiral James Stavridis (USN, Ret.) and James Ackerman did in their pair of thrillers "2034" and "2054," Carr uses the thriller genre to convey through fiction what is the reality of superpower competition and possible conflict with China is today. As John le Carré and Tom Clancy did for reading Americans, thriller writers like these are now trying to do vis-a-vis China’s ambitions and its leadership and its Communist Party spy network. 
 
Most Americans don’t read think tank reports. More do read columns like Rogin’s. The threat and the stuff needed to deter it is in the public domain. I get this public domain stuff flagged for me because of friends and family in Congress, the military and tech.  

I book Carr, Stavridis, Ackerman, Daniel Silva, Brad Thor, C.J. Box and other thriller writers not because they are friends though some are, but because "shock and awe" is a risk for us as well as our enemies and they write about these risks in accessible and entertaining ways.  

The more that senior military figures like Paparo and figures in the intelligence and tech communities join the thriller writers in spelling out the scenarios for the public through responsible outlets and the more Congress throws the spotlight on our most powerful enemies, the better off every American is.  
 
More from the senior brass, please. And soon. 

TO READ MORE FROM HUGH HEWITT

Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.